Brian Cloutier wrote: > Are you asking for a volunteer? Yes! > I don't have the time necessary to finish the project. But I have some > time soon I can use to get the ball rolling if you want. Well, rolling balls are ... what we have a lot i guess. I'm trying to establish a new way of maintening in that you can fork glob2 from http://bitbucket.org/giszmo/glob2/ for example and announce once it is worth being merged and we merge it into "trunk" then. this way you don't need write access to trunk or provide single patches. the down side might be that the idea of "worth being merged" differs but normally working features would definitely be reintegrated. > I think the easiest way to approach this would be > to separate everything into a libyog, and then add a server binary. Actually I hoped to hear from the old developers that this is already done somehow as I can't believe they designed yog without headless servers in mind. But else: Feel free to work on it. My approach would rather be to split it into a headless part and a GUI lib so the server runtime does not need the GUI lib but maybe there is much more stuff that is not actually used in the server. > What do you think? go for it. it would be great if we could run the server without x :)
Regards, Leo Wandersleb _______________________________________________ glob2-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
