On 7/4/06, Jim Torson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If we apply Michael's criteria of rejecting information from
> "advocates," then this certainly would qualify for rejection.
I don't think this; I don't expect that neutrality on the flat earth
question, for instance, will yield the best results in a discussion on
the geometry of the earth. The whole point of science is to settle
questions.
mt
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
