The RealClimate website recently posted some discussion
on some articles supposedly describing research by the
Woods Hole Research Center on Amazonian drought:


AMAZONIAN DROUGHT
By Gavin
RealClimate.Org
August 4, 2006

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=333


----------------

The comments on this discussion include the following,
which should clarify the views of the WHRC scientists:

Comment #35:


Posted on behalf of Daniel Nepstad, senior 
scientist at the Woods Hole Research Center, and 
lead investigator on the forest drought 
experiment. (Via Elizabeth Braun, Director of Communications at the Center.) -

On July 23, The Independent report on the recent 
findings of our forest drought experiment in the 
Amazon, in which we reduced rainfall inputs to a 
hectare of forest over a five-year period. This 
alarmist article involved no interview, and it 
contains many statements that I do not support.

To clarify, our results do not show that the 
rainforest 'could become a desert'. In the third 
paragraph, the piece implies that I support the 
position that drought in the Amazon will lead to 
drought that would spread to Britain, with the 
world spinning out of control, becoming uninhabitable. That is simply not true.

What our work does show is that the drought we 
imposed caused big trees to die more than small 
trees, which was a surprise. We also know that 
the amounts of carbon that may be going to the 
atmosphere following Amazon droughts are probably 
big enough to accelerate global warming. 
Currently trends suggest that a big chunk of the 
Amazon forest will probably be displaced by 
fire-prone scrub vegetation; global warming will 
probably exacerbate this trend.

The challenges we are confronting and those that 
we will be faced with in the future are 
significant. The world's tropical rainforests 
will be changed in important ways by global 
warming. But public understanding of these 
processes is not served by evoking apocalyptic 
images. What is needed now is credible reporting 
and sound journalism so that the global community can act wisely.

[Response: Thank you very much for the clarification. - gavin]

Comment by Elizabeth Braun ­ 5 Aug 2006 @ 
<http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=333#comment-17074>1:57 pm



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change.

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to