Eli Rabett wrote:
> The base problem against a Sgt. Schultz defence (I don't know nothing)
> is that Michaels benefited monetarily and in other ways from what is
> potentially an impersonation of a state official.
>
> OTOH, we could then go back and read all the stirring defenses of
> Michaels, the eminent State Climatologist (but he did stay once at
> Holiday Inn Express).
Eh, well, I don't see this as much more than a bureaucratic screwup.
And it distracts attention from the more substantive problems with
Michaels' public statements and science.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
