----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Tobis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 7:02 PM
Subject: [Global Change: 916] Re: Carbon capture from the air
>
> Any carbon sequestration approach must operate at a substantial energy
> profit versus coal.
The problem is that the cheapest (most economic) way is to change
nothing! But to solve the problem of a future catastrophy will involve
a major expense, and a reduction in everyone's energy consumpton.
Everything else is just hand-waving.
Cheers, alastair.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
