> it's not necessary to push people to live in utterly cramped > conditions, because that's supposedly the way to go to protect the > climate.
While there is something to your points, you inadvertently undermine your argument. I frankly can't avoid thinking the following. If "utterly cramped conditions" encourage you and others like you to have fewer than the five children to which you are otherwise inclined, I would consider it an extremely effective way to protect the global environment. Meanwhile, everyone is discussing whether the Stern report gets the right answer. http://tinyurl.com/ye5to7 I'd rather discuss whether the Stern report asks the right question. mt --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of global environmental change. Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not gratuitously rude. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
