> On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Alastair McDonald wrote:
>> William, I take it that you and Raymond now believe that drastic action
>> should be taken. How drastic do you propose?
>
> This seems like a blatant non-sequitor. What is the point?
The quote from the article which is highlighted, and the theme of the
article is "The scientific base for a greenhouse warming is too uncertain
to justify drastic action at this time."
If you believe that Singer and Revelle were wrong, then you must believe
that drastic action was needed then, and that action even more drastic is
needed now. What precise actions do you propose?
Cheers, Alastair.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
