At 09:51 PM 4/30/2007, Rob Jacob wrote: >For your second post: cold fusion has long been known to be indeed >cold, but not fusion and not a source of energy for our modern >society. See DOE's report: >http://www.science.doe.gov/Sub/Newsroom/News_Releases/DOE-SC/2004/low_energy/index.htm > >Rob Jacob
I am well aware of the DOE report. Here's a discussion of it that includes some critiques: 2004 DoE Review of Cold Fusion http://www.lenr-canr.org/Collections/DoeReview.htm As I said, I am convinced that the scientific community is ignoring and denying the evidence of an anomalous phenomenon. Jim --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of global environmental change. Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not gratuitously rude. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
