This article argues that the UK (and other governments) are lying boldface about having a 2C target:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2069395,00.html The article incorrectly states that the CO2 level is 459ppm, but perhaps he meant the current lowest realistic maximum. Anyway, the politics of giving up on the 2C target are interesting. I wonder if anyone has come up with a timeline for giving up on 3C, 4C, etc. as we continue without a serious treaty to set a cap. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of global environmental change. Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not gratuitously rude. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
