> I wish things were actually as rational as you suggest.  Al Gore
> (whether you like his movie or not) has a new commentary on the
> "control" side of things.  Here's a link to an excerpt:
>
> http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1622015,00.html

Maybe Al Gore is romanticising the past a bit too much. The whole
point of representative democracy was that direct democracy was not
only technically impossible, but people weren't sufficiently informed
to make decisions for themselves. Not unreasonable, particularly at
the time with 90% of Americans subsistence farmers and analphabets.
That's why their democratic input was and still is in fact reduced to
selecting representatives rather than voting in frequent referenda on
major issues.

And I don't buy the idea that television is responsible for a recent
reduction in the public's grasp of reality and reason. The evidence
that there has been any such decline is awfully anecdotal and does not
square with a number of trends, eg:

http://politicalarithmetik.blogspot.com/2007/02/would-you-vote-for-fill-in-blank-for.html

In 1960, only 40% of the public were willing to vote for a black
President. There's been a pretty steady rise, and now it's over 95%.

Was that percentage in 1960 due to the public being so open to reason
and so well informed by the independent print media?







--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to