----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Tobis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: gmane.science.general.global-change
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 9:11 PM
Subject: [Global Change: 1554] Re: How was acid rain and CFC reduction 
successful?


> Regarding acid rain, this is handled on a continental scale, which in
> North America just involves two similar countries, so it's much more
> tractable.  I believe that this problem has *not* been solved on a
> global scale.
>
> It's the coal, not the oil interests here, that are crucial. In
> practice we will likely have to settle for coal fired plants with deep
> sequestration even if renewables plus hydrogen or hydraulics for
> energy storage would be cheaper and cleaner.
>
> mt

Nobody has mentioned in this thread the role that a policy innovation played 
in lowering opposition to sulfur emissions regulation: "cap and trade" was 
implemented in the clean air act to allow industry to adjust to a new 
emission reduction regime at least cost.

That is a good lesson from history, and is gradually gaining acceptance as a 
mechanism for carbon emissions regulation.  So far, carbon emission markets, 
like sulfur emission markets before them, are regional rather than global. 
There is room for improvement.

The sulfur emission control regime implemented in the clean air act of 1990 
pitted high-sulfur coal interests against low-sulfur coal interests.  There 
may be lessons to learn there as well about negotiating and managing the 
impacts of new regs on particular industry sectors (i.e. high-carbon fuel 
interests v. low-carbon fuel interests).

-dl




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to