Tom, that's a really interesting observation. Is there some
possibility you could expand on this into a longer essay?

David, well said, and as it happens quite useful to me at this exact
moment. However, I don't actually think Tom disagrees with you; he
speaks of a "misuse" of skepticism".

In this regard I'd like to add two things. The first is my recent
observation of how clueless scientists are about what they are up
against, reinforcing David's point:

http://initforthegold.blogspot.com/2007/07/climatological-culture-wunsch-and.html

The second is, "I toljaso", quoting msyelf from 1996

"My concern is that the weaponry of relativism is only coincidentally
and temporarily associated with the rhetoric of freedom and dignity.
Less developed versions of the same thing have been used in the
Stalinist and Nazi tyrannies. This is a central fact of the history of
twentieth century science. In developing a rhetoric of willful
uncertainty and confusion (somehow ignoring manifest and spectacular
success) and conferring some sort of academic respectability upon it,
the relativists are developing a weapon that can and would be used by
spectacularly malevolent forces in the process of subverting and
eliminating the very sorts of human dignity contemporary proponents
believe themselves to be promoting. Ultimately it comes down to the
triumph of the ad hominem over the substantive. In that case, it is a
trivial matter to move the trusted class from tofu munching bicycle
commuting book collecting casual buddhist environmentalist utopians (I
have described the class so as to include myself) to gun totin beer
guzzlin angry racist tax paranoids. If such people ever get the sort
of power they aspire to, they will need a front of intellectual
respectability, and the machinery of radical relativism will prove
remarkably malleable. "

That's documented (thanks!) at
http://www.swin.edu.au/chem/complex/vp/vp04/vp04.html

mt

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to