For very large perturbations it is a tedious and complex calculation,
but for relatively small perturbations a linear approximation
suffices. It is true that the correction for large perturbations
reduces the contribution to slower than linear. The definition of
"large" depends on the particular constituent and the particular
atmosphere.

I think the 'global warming potentials" are some sort of
linearization, but  the chemical lifetimes of the constituents are
taken into account in some way I don't understand. As a consequence I
am not sure that even with James' correction that Nils' calculation is
the right one, though something like it should be doable.

mt

On 8/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > CO2-eq is used to mean the equivalent CO2 concentration, holding other
> > gases fixed at the pre-industrial level. So you have to subtract off the
> > pre-ind level off CH4 and N2O from your sums. I think what you have
> > effectively done is work out the CO2-equivalent if all other gases were
> > zero.
>
> So far so good, but:
>
> Can we really just add up like that? I understand that for CO2
> concentration the effect is logarithmic, presumably that's also the
> case for other GHG's and then isn't there such a thing as overlap
> between the absorption bands of different GHG's?
>
> I don't really understand the basic physics of spectroscopy very well,
> but from what I've read I thought it was a lot more complicated than
> simple addition?
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to