Yeah, the other amusing thing about this particular troll is the idea
that evidence from "activist sites" (including RC!) doesn't count.
"The deck is full of red deuces, so long as you ignore the black
cards, the picture cards and the numbers bigger than two and a half,
all of which obviously have an agenda." Indeed.
Still, a troll is a troll. No matter how sadly amusing this particular
challenge was, I think we really ought to provide one place where the
conversation has moved on from the "global warming, misguided myth or
vicious conspiracy" question.
mt
> On Dec 31 2007, 12:30am, okc chemist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I defy anyone to prove to me that "global warming" is irrefutably a
> > predominantly anthropogenic process. The scientific method does not
> > get you there, true facts on A.G.W. are few and far between. Please do
> > not give me links to environmental activist sites like Real Climate. I
> > said irrefutable evidence, not politics.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
