> Today I would like to announce an initiative that would actually have a hope
> of making a dent in the CO2 problem: a Million Herreshoff Furnaces!
Seems like a waste, why not turn biomass (CH2O) into CO2 and H2, use
the H2 for energy and bury the CO2? If you bury the C you also bury
nearly all of the energy content of the biomass.
Mind you, I am aware of reasons why you'd rather bury the charcoal (H2
is difficult to store, gasfication is capital intensive, it also costs
some energy to bury the CO2).
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
