> I have a different argument - if you hate government intrusion
> into people’s lives, you'd better stop catastrophic global warming,
> because nothing drives a country more towards activist government
> than scarcity and depravation. Interestingly, Krauthammer
> understand this point abstractly, but since he has no
> understanding of climate science, indeed he has no interest in
> learning about the subject at all, he gets the argument exactly
> backwards.
You are right! But getting arguments exactly wrong is not unusual.
Anyone can make a wrong argument convincing it they make it with
enough force.
But why did you leave your main point to last? Make your main
point first before people give up reading what you have taken
a long time to prepare :-(
HTH,
Cheers, Alastair.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
