On Sep 12, 9:06 am, Tom Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 8, 9:04 am, Tom Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 7, 12:13 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > Maybe she's been misquoted.
>
> > > Ok, she clearly hasn't.
>
> > The news is saying that she be interviewed on ABC later
> > this week.
>
> > Perhaps she will be asked about her disbelief that global warming is
> > man-made.  And also about her desire to outlaw abortions for 13-year-
> > old girls who have been raped by their fathers or brothers.
>
> Well here's Palin on Global Warming from yesterday's debate:
>
> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-roberts/palin-maintains-global-wa...
>
> Sorry to use such a flaming liberal site, but it's the first I turned
> up with what appears to be a full transcript of the Q&A on global
> warming>
>
> Palin says GW "can be" man-made and man "is potentially causing" GW.
>
> I am sure that admitting the theoretical possibility is going to
> confuse almost everyone.  It even worked on the interviewer Gibson,
> one of the top newmen in the USA who immediately said: "now you're
> beginning to say it is man-made".

Huffington cut the last answer short:

"I think you are a cynic," Palin said, "because show me where I've
said there's absolute proof that nothing that man has ever conducted
or engaged in has had any effect or no effect on climate change."

Huffington left out:

"I have not said that. I have said that my belief is there is a
cyclical nature of our planet — warming trends, cooling trends — I'm
not going to argue scientists because I believe in science and have
such a great respect for what they are telling us. I'm not going to
disagree with the point that they make that man's activities can be
attributed to changes."

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/09/palin-flip-flop.html

So she does not disagree "that man's activites can be attributed to
changes."   Are there some scientist publishing evidence that the IPCC
activities are caused by global warming?

Is that a garbled recant of her earlier denial?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to