Here's an interesting study, how about locking CO2 into peridotite
rock formations? They say peridotite is highly reactive with CO2 to
form limestone and other carbonates.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scientists Recommend Permanent Method For Carbon Sequestration: Turn
CO2 into Rock
A breaking study indicates that 4 billion tons of carbon dioxide a
year could be locked up in rock formations that cover half of Oman—
finally putting a dent in global greenhouse gases. And the same
principle could be transferred to rock formations in shallow seas.

By Jon Luoma
Published on: November 17, 2008

As PM reported in July, Columbia University geologist Peter Kelemen
has been studying peridotite, a highly-reactive rock that covers about
half the landscape of Oman, and appears at scattered locations
worldwide. The rock naturally reacts with carbon dioxide (CO2),
removing it from the air to form limestone and other carbonates.

In a study published November 11 in the Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, Kelemen and Columbia geochemist Jurg Matter
suggest the natural process of removing CO2 from the air could be
accelerated 100,000 fold, enough to make a significant dent in global
warming. They calculate that Oman's peridotite alone could sequester 4
billion tons of CO2 per year, one-eighth of the 30 billion tons of CO2
humans emit annually. The researchers suggest that CO2 captured from
power plants and other sources could be pumped down boreholes into
peridotite. Using fracturing technology borrowed from the petroleum
industry to shatter the rock and expose more of its surface area, CO2
would seep into the peridotite hundreds of feet below the ground. Heat
would be added initially to accelerate chemical reactions. But as new
carbonate rock begins forming, the process could start feeding on
itself, with new carbonate rock continually fracturing the host rock
further, and the heat from the reaction supplementing the deep-Earth's
heat.

The two scientists also offered a second scenario that Kelemen calls
"even more intriguing." The alternative method would remove CO2
directly from the air and transfer it to boreholes drilled into
peridotite formations in shallow water just off the Oman coast.
Surface seawater naturally sponges up carbon dioxide until it reaches
chemical equilibrium; a saturation point. In this scenario, seawater
would be pumped deep into one borehole. Heated naturally by the Earth
to about 185 C, it would release its CO2 again to form carbonate
rocks. Rising to the surface via a second, paired hole, the seawater
could then sop up more CO2, continuing a cycle that, once started,
might be self-sustained by simple convection.

If it worked, the second method would require far more extensive
fields of boreholes because of the limited ability of seawater to take
up CO2. But it would also eliminate both the complexity and cost of
capturing pure CO2 at the source, and of transporting it. "The air,"
says Kelemen, "transports CO2 for free."

There are other major advantages to what Keleman terms air capture."
"Not only don't we have to capture the CO2 at places like power
plants," he says, "there's a substantial portion of CO2 that comes
from places where we wouldn't have any hope of capturing it—CO2
emitted by cars, for example." Kelemen notes that there appear to be
few ways to accelerate the rate of carbon transformation in this
second option. Even if it were possible to pump more seawater through
the boreholes, doing so would be self-defeating. "If you pumped at an
intensified rate, you'll just cool the rocks down," he says.

Yet he notes that "with enough holes" this approach alone might still
be able to capture a large portion of the atmosphere's excess
greenhouse gas. Effective air-capture technology could also mean that
peridotite formations in shallow seas elsewhere, including remote New
Caledonia and Papua New Guinea, could come into play.

Kelemen cautions, however, that the team has only begun its work on
the seawater option, and that data are far more preliminary than for
the more developed land-based scenario. In the short term, a land-
based system in Oman could be fed pure CO2 captured from power plants
and refineries across the Middle East and fed down a pipeline, one
that might eventually be extended to the Balkan states or beyond.

Although some peridotite formations lie off the coast of California,
options for using the technology to help directly control CO2
emissions in the U.S. are limited. No matter, says Kelemen. "The
problem is global. We'll need lots of approaches. I don't think it's
wise to even be looking for one, big golden fix."

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/earth/4292181.html

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to