On Nov 30, 11:12 pm, Christopher Calder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your neglecting to mention the millions of acres of rainforest that
> the Brazilians have burned down in the past few years in order to grow
> more sugarcane for ethanol.

This is false.  Sugarcane does not grow well in tropical rainforest
conditions.  All sugarcane in Brazil is grown far to the south of the
Amazon Basin, from Mato Grosso across to the Northeast, with most in
the middlek, but I don't remember the name of the state (province).

Your statement regarding biofuel contribution to the recently ended
uptick in food prices is also false; ethanol-from-corn contributed
onaly about 6% of the total uptick.

That said, I certainly do not favor ethanol-from-corn, does nothing to
speak of regarding global warming.  Ethanol from sugarcane is, on the
other hand, a help and sugar is a seriious glut on world markets.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to