From: "James Annan" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: gmane.science.general.global-change
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 2:11 AM
Subject: [Global Change: 3136] Re: CO2 --> C + O2 ?



Nick Santos wrote:
>> plants are much more efficient than any machine we could make to do the
>> same process, but someone who knows better could feel free to correct me.
>
>In terms of absorbing solar radiation and using it to photosynthesise,
>plants are not very efficient at all when compared to various solar
>schemes for energy collection.

Here's one step: CO2 --> CO + O

http://www.sandia.gov/news/resources/releases/2007/sunshine.html

Now I wonder if feeding CO back into this machine in a second step would 
give me my carbon black to remove from the global carbon cycle  CO --> C + O 
?

-dl 


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to