From
http://www.amath.washington.edu/people/faculty/tung/publications.html

K.K. Tung, J. Zhou and C.D.Camp; 2008: "Constraining Model Transient
Climate Response using Independent Observations of Solar-Cycle Forcing
and Response" Geophys. Research Lett., 35, L17707,doi:
10.1029/2008GL034240.

building on

K.K. Tung and C.D. Camp; 2008: "Solar Cycle Warming at the Earth's
Surface in NCEP and ERA-40 data: A linear Discriminant Analysis"
Journal of Geophysical Research, 113, D05114, doi:
10.1029/2007JD009164.

C.D. Camp and K.K. Tung; 2007: "Surface Warming by the Solar Cycle as
Revealed the Composite Mean Difference Projection" Geophysical
Research Letters, 34, L14703, doi:10.1029/2007GL030207.

obtain a rather large value, greater than 3.8, for equilibrium
(Charney) climate sensitivity.  The earlier two papers show that the
temperature variation between solar minimum and maximum of a solar
cycle is about 0.2K.

I don't see anything actually wrong, but I'm suspicious of such large
values.  Comments about what might have gone wrong, if anything, will
be appreciated.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to