Christopher, I notice you reference Lovelock. Lovelock seems to have moved on from Nuclear to Biochar. See this reference:
"Do you still advocate nuclear power as a solution to climate change? It is a way for the UK to solve its energy problems, but it is not a global cure for climate change. It is too late for emissions reduction measures. So are we doomed? There is one way we could save ourselves and that is through the massive burial of charcoal. It would mean farmers turning all their agricultural waste - which contains carbon that the plants have spent the summer sequestering - into non-biodegradable charcoal, and burying it in the soil. Then you can start shifting really hefty quantities of carbon out of the system and pull the CO2 down quite fast." http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126921.500-one-last-chance-to-save-mankind.html?full=true (But this site is 3 months old, perhaps Lovelock has moved on to something else by now ;-). Maybe Lovelock thinks we could gear up Biochar faster than we could gear up Nuclear? And maybe a sink-inhancement is better than source elimination if you think the matter is urgent? Not sure what his reasoning is, or how sound. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of global environmental change. Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not gratuitously rude. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
