Michael Tobis wrote:
> I think that's probably true. What a pity how very little sense that
> makes in the real world.
>
> mt
>
> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 10:48 AM, The Cunctator <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> I think most environmentalists are trying to figure out how to
> improve the bill. This is the vehicle Obama has chosen. A defeat of
> Waxman-Markey will be seen as a crushing political defeat for Obama,
> which will make Democratic politicians profoundly unwilling to
> tackle climate legislation.
So we will enjoy the unedifying spectacle of various "green" groups
fighting tooth and nail to to support something that (from the limited
attention I've given it) seems to be basically hopeless. How delightful.
James
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
