On Sep 10, 12:19 pm, Michael Tobis <[email protected]> wrote:
> Oddly I sympathize with both of Heiko's extremes, but in either case
> it is very long term thinking.
>
> I think most of us can agree that we DON'T want an abrupt and
> involuntary population collapse in the current century or the next. It
> seems that goal is quite enough to keep us occupied for the present.
>
> mt
There is a social movement that thinks that global warming does not
matter, because technological advances will swamp the whole issue
soon:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singularitarianism
A tiny movement at this point, perhaps.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
