Investment banker pay squeezed as fees slump
Thu May 14, 2009 2:29pm IST
 


 
 






 
 By Narayanan Somasundaram and Michael Flaherty
 
MUMBAI/HONG KONG  - The number of well-paid investment bankers in India is 
getting harder to justify. Many more will likely see their salaries slashed or 
lose their jobs.
 
Excessive pay is under scrutiny at banks around the globe, but nowhere in Asia 
is the downward pressure on salaries stronger than in India where deal flow has 
almost completely dried up.
 
The downturn has widened the already large gap between investment banking costs 
and fees in India. Competition for deals is fierce and companies are not 
willing to pay the 3 to 4 percent commissions common in Hong Kong or Singapore.
 
Credit Suisse, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley and other Western investment banks 
are expected to be the hardest hit, having expanded more rapidly than the 
scores of domestic banks in Asia's third-largest economy.
 
"Ultimately there are only so many companies that are looking at M&As, fund 
raising and PE. And to top it up, Indian firms are very tight with their fees," 
said Chaitanya Kumar, an ex-Lehman Brothers banker and founder of The School of 
Investment Banking in Mumbai.
 
In the first quarter, India investment banking fees came to a mere $107 
million, on pace to end the year 50 percent lower than in 2008, according to 
Thomson Reuters and Freeman Co. data.
That compares with $1.8 billion in the rest of Asia-Pacific, much of which was 
generated in a few major centres such as China and Singapore. Asia-Pacific 
brought in $9.9 billion in banking fees last year, while India earned $847 
million, the data show.
Freeman compiles fee data through an algorithm based on traditional fee 
percentages. Most fees are undisclosed.
 
The top investment banks in India brought in, on average, anywhere from $80 
million to $120 million in revenues in 2007 alone, according to bankers and 
executive search professionals.
 
Those days are long gone.
"Year to date, I've seen one bank with $20 million in revenue, and others who 
will be happy to get to $20 million by year end," said an executive search 
source, who works with Wall Street and European banks in India.
Bankers hope that the upcoming Indian election results will establish a sense 
of stability, opening up the pipeline for initial public offerings, bond and 
merger deals that have been shelved due to the financial crisis.
But even if that does happen, experts say, it's still hard to justify the high 
salaries being handed out to the legions of bankers competing for a dwindling 
pool of fees. 
 
"Some investment banks may have over committed to India. The number of firms 
that are considered bankable by global firms is quite small and competition is 
very stiff," said Kumar.
 

OVERCOMMITMENT, OVERPAY
Western investment banks aggressively built-up teams in India, aiming to 
capitalise on one of the world's fastest growing economies. Most Western banks 
went from a few people to around 25, with some adding more than 40 bankers in 
barely a year.
Now there is an oversupply of bankers and fees are sliding.
"Unfortunately, since there are so many bankers chasing the same deals, you 
tend to undercut on fees, and when you undercut, nobody ends up making much 
money," said Timmy Kandhari, executive director and corporate finance team 
member at PricewaterhouseCoopers.
 
Despite lower fees, a lot of India's bankers enjoy high salaries.
On Wall Street, a managing director (MD) in a typical year gets roughly 
$200,000 in salary, and at least $1 million in bonus. And in a bull market, 
it's not unheard of for an MD to haul in several millions to tens of millions 
of dollars.
India MDs have earned around $2 million in salary and bonus in recent years, 
with some directors earning $1 million, and vice presidents making around 
$750,000, sources say.
 
The sources who spoke about pay did not want to be named because of the 
sensitivity around the issue.
As a result of the high cost base, investment banks are likely to cut more amid 
the economic slowdown, even though they have, in some cases, halved their staff 
strength.
 
India remains a promising market for investment banks over the long term. 
Strong economic growth rates have created huge amounts of wealth and there was 
a flurry of home-spun IPOs and cross-border acquisitions up until late last 
year.
But India is a developing economy with many banks. Fierce competition for deals 
pushes fee payouts deeper down the scale.
Case in point: Reliance Power's $2.9 billion IPO last year had ten banks 
managing the offering.
A deal that may generate a 3 percent to 4 percent fee in Hong Kong or 
Singapore, is more likely to get around 1 percent in Mumbai, experts say.
 
Banks also rarely get retainers in India, meaning they could put a lot of work 
into a deal and get zero in pay if it fails.
All of these factors are leading some to say that India banks need to change 
the way they operate.
 
"We may see some movements into fixed pay, and the right to claw back bonuses 
if business is harmed over the long term," said Namrita Jhangiani, who heads 
the financial services practice at placement firm Egon Zehnder International in 
Mumbai.




 


MSN Quiz Test your skill and wits on this revered battleground of knowledge 
IMing with Windows Live Messenger just got better.
_________________________________________________________________
Live Search extreme As India feels the heat of poll season, get all the info 
you need on the MSN News Aggregator
http://news.in.msn.com/National/indiaelections2009/aggregator/default.aspx
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""GLOBAL SPECULATORS"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalspeculators?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to