The Dollar’s Last
Days?<http://www.project-syndicate.org/print_commentary/wijnholds1/commentary/wijnholds1>
by
Onno Wijnholds <http://www.project-syndicate.org/contributor/521>

CAMBRIDGE – Zhou Xiaochuan, the governor of the People’s Bank of China,
recently suggested that replacing the dollar with the International Monetary
Fund’s Special Drawing Rights as the dominant reserve currency would bring
greater stability to the global financial system. The idea of reforming the
system by introducing a supranational reserve currency is also, it appears,
supported by Russia and other emerging markets. And a United Nations
advisory committee chaired by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz has argued
for a new global reserve currency, possibly one based on the SDR.

Transforming the dollar standard into an SDR-based system would be a major
break with a policy that has lasted more than 60 years. The SDR was
introduced 40 years ago to supplement what was then seen as an inadequate
level of global reserves, and was subsequently enshrined in the IMF’s
amended Articles of Agreement as the future principal reserve asset.

But the world soon became awash in dollars. So, instead of becoming the
principal reserve asset of the global system, the proportion of SDRs in
global reserves shrank to a tiny fraction, rendering the SDR the monetary
equivalent of Esperanto.

Although the euro, created in 1999, turned out to be a more serious
competitor to the dollar, its share in total international reserves has
probably remained below 30%, compared to 65% for the dollar (these shares
are in part estimates, as China, the world’s largest holder of reserves,
does not report the currency composition of its holdings).

There are two ways in which the dollar’s role in the international monetary
system can be reduced. One possibility is a gradual, market-determined
erosion of the dollar as a reserve currency in favor of the euro. But, while
the euro’s international role – especially its use in financial markets –
has increased since its inception, it is hard to envisage it overtaking the
dollar as the dominant reserve currency in the foreseeable future.

Such an outcome is probably only possible if two conditions are met: first,
the United Kingdom joins the euro area, and, second, the United States makes
serious, confidence-sapping mistakes. The latter condition may already have
been partially met, but US policies to stabilize its financial system should
help avoid a major dollar slide. Moreover, the European Central Bank has
repeatedly stated that it neither encourages nor discourages the euro’s
international role.

With the dollar’s hegemony unlikely to be seriously undermined by market
forces, at least in the short and medium-term, the only way to bring about a
major reduction in its role as a reserve currency is by international
agreement. The Chinese proposal falls into this category.

One way to make the SDR the major reserve currency relatively soon would be
to create and allocate a massive amount of new SDRs to the IMF’s members.
While the G-20 leaders have decided to support an SDR allocation of $250
billion, this will increase the share of SDRs in total international
reserves to no more than 4%. In order to make the SDR the principal reserve
asset via the allocation route, close to $3 trillion in SDRs would need to
be created, an unrealistic proposition.

But there is a more realistic way for the SDR’s importance to grow. Back in
1980, the IMF came close to adopting a so-called SDR Substitution Account.
The idea was to permit countries whose official dollar holdings were larger
than they were comfortable with to convert dollars into SDRs. Conversion
would occur outside the market, and thus would not put downward pressure on
the dollar. Member countries would receive an asset that was more stable
than the dollar, as it was based on a basket of currencies, thereby
providing better protection against losses.

The plan fell apart when some major IMF shareholders could not accept the
burden-sharing arrangements that would be necessary in case of losses due to
exchange-rate movements. The US also lost interest in the scheme as the
dollar strengthened.

What are the chances of adopting a scheme of this kind today? Is the US
prepared to go along with a reform of the international monetary system that
reduces the dollar’s role?

Until recently, I would have considered this unlikely. But the changed
international climate, and the possibility of a bout of severe dollar
weakness, could convince the US to go along with a conversion scheme that
would alleviate excessive pressure on the dollar. And, apart from possible
political considerations, large holders of dollars would find a substitution
account attractive as a form of protection against strong fluctuations in
the dollar’s value. What about possible losses suffered by the Substitution
Account? This can be dealt with by setting aside part of the IMF’s large
gold stock.

Even if an SDR Substitution Account is established, it is unlikely that the
dollar’s share in international reserves would fall to an insignificant
level. The dollar will remain important for many countries as a vehicle for
intervention in foreign-exchange markets, as well as for invoicing and for
denominating internationally traded securities.

But one can envisage a system in which international reserves are held each
in roughly equal shares of dollars, euros (assuming a further gradual
increase in its share), and SDRs. While there are currently other
priorities, it would be useful for the IMF to study anew an SDR substitution
account and similar schemes. If it does not, the debate will take place
elsewhere.

*Onno de Beaufort Wijnholds* *is a former executive director of the
International Monetary Fund and a former permanent representative of the
European Central Bank in the US.*

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""GLOBAL SPECULATORS"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalspeculators?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to