Jai Corp's showpiece projects remain on paper


Shobhana Subramanian / Mumbai June 30, 2009, 0:03 IST




The blueprint for a Mumbai makeover by Mukesh Ambani’s close associate is 
barely off the drawing board.





























 







 









 















 







 
















 




In early 2008, when the stock market was at a dizzying height, the Jai Corp 
stock almost hit Rs 1,400, while its market capitalisation nudged Rs 25,000 
crore.

The Street believed Jai Corp was a good bet — after all, the promoter of the 
company was none other than Anand Jain, who also happened to be Reliance 
Industries Chairman Mukesh Ambani’s close friend and business associate.

Much has changed since then. At Rs 287 today, Jai Corp’s share price is just a 
fifth of its peak. Of course, the market too has tumbled in the same period, 
but the bigger reason for the collapse in the company’s valuation is that many 
of its showpiece projects are in limbo.

Jain and Ambani, who operate from neighbouring offices in Mumbai’s Nariman 
Point, had ambitious plans for a makeover for Mumbai.

The blueprint: To set up a couple of large Special Economic Zones (SEZs) across 
17,500 acres in Mumbai and Navi Mumbai, build the 22 km Mumbai TransHarbour 
Link (MTHL), construct a new airport in Navi Mumbai, develop a port at Rewas on 
the outskirts of the city and pitch for a couple of stretches of the Metro 
Rail. Jain also had his own plans for a power plant and a dam for the SEZs.

With Ambani as a partner, the Street believed Jai Corp had a winner on its 
hands and the estimated Rs 34,000 crore financial outlay for these projects was 
no big deal. Jain’s share in this investment would have been anyway around Rs 
2,600 crore.

The profit potential of these projects, in which Jai Corp’s stake would have 
been roughly 10 per cent, was large enough for a local investment bank to value 
the company at Rs 17,000 crore to Rs 18,000 crore.

In fact, Jai Corp’s stake of 10 per cent in each of the SEZs was together 
valued at close to Rs 14,000 crore and the company raised around Rs 1,600 crore 
from investors by placing shares at a price of around Rs 1,000 per share.

But those numbers seem to be distant now. Here’s why.

The Mumbai SEZ (MSEZ), for instance, has run into trouble with the Supreme 
Court not extending the time period for acquisition of land.
  




THE WAIT LIST

Project

Status

Mumbai SEZ
Land partly acquired, but no government
consent yet for transfer of land to MSEZ

Navi Mumbai SEZ
Master plan being finalised, boundary
walls being built

Airport
CIDCO yet to get okay to conduct
environment-impact study

MTHL
State government yet to call for bids after
two failed attempts

Rewas Port
Maharashtra port policy in place but no
financial closure

Metro rail
Bids not invited by the government yet for
next phase


According to reports, only 20 per cent of the total targeted 11,000 hectares in 
Raigad has been acquired as farmers are reluctant to sell their land.

 Jai Corp sources, however, said 5,000 acres had been acquired so far and 
although the Supreme Court hadn’t extended the time required for MSEZ to get 
the consent to transfer the land in its name, it would try and get it within 
the time frame of July 8 this year.

“We’re not saying there is no stress or pressure, but we have to push and get 
it done within the time frame,” says a person close to the development.

Jai Corp, according to sources, is understood to be banking on the Maharashtra 
government to help the MSEZ to acquire the additional land so that it can go 
ahead with the project.

Meanwhile, the Rs 6,300 crore Navi Mumbai SEZ is making some progress with the 
boundary walls coming up and the master plan due to be ready soon, according to 
senior executives in City Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO).

Moreover, the project has achieved financial closure though CIDCO officials say 
“activity at the moment is slow” because not too many companies have evinced 
interest in the SEZ.

Although the difficult economic environment is one reason for this, the fact 
that the fate of the new airport in Navi Mumbai is uncertain also appears to be 
keeping prospective users of the SEZ away for the moment.

CIDCO officials said they have submitted the terms for the environment impact 
assessment study for the airport, but were yet to receive the go-ahead from the 
central government.

According to CIDCO, it start inviting bids for the Rs 5,000 crore project only 
after it gets an environment clearance.

The process of getting the clearance, it says, could take at least another six 
months.

Jai Corp’s proposed port at Rewas, to be constructed at a cost of Rs 5,000 
crore, hasn’t got off the ground either.

The Maharashtra Maritime Board recently approved a port policy, but it could 
take a while for the project to begin because the finances haven’t yet been 
tied up.

Similarly, the Rs 6,000 crore trans-harbour link project is in troubled waters.

Jai Corp had wanted to participate  as part of a consortium in the Maharashtra 
government’s  project.

It is, however, yet to take off because even two rounds of bidding failed to 
throw up a winner.

The state government now proposes to call for fresh bids to develop the link, 
though officials are not clear when the process will get going.

As for the Mumbai Metro projects, the first two lines are being set up by the 
Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group and the state government is yet to invite bids for 
the remaining six lines.

So here, too, it could be a long wait for prospective bidders

_________________________________________________________________
cricket and news. Logon to MSN Video for the latest clips
http://www.exploremyway.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""GLOBAL SPECULATORS"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalspeculators?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to