David Rosenberg is quick to note the continuing collapse in credit.  One has
to wonder – in a fractional reserve system that is largely based on credit
growth – just how long can assets appreciate without growth in credit?
Consumer credit is out this Friday.  Expect more weakness.

Looking at the chart below, one can get a real appreciation of the way
things are — credit is still contracting and this balance sheet repair among
debtors and lenders is necessary in order to make the transition, as painful
as it may be, to the next sustainable economic expansion and bull market.
Bank lending has declined now for 21 weeks in a row, and last week sank an
unbelievable $33 billion, and over this entire frame, the amount of loans &
leases that has vanished has totalled an amazing $216 billion or a record
15% annual rate. (As an aside, and a blow to the V-shaped advocates, the
FDIC closed another NINE banks to close out the week.)

[image: cred] <http://pragcap.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/cred.PNG>

The contraction in bank credit is broad based across all lines of business —
consumer, real estate and companies — and seems to be motivated by both the
bank and the borrower. This is a dead-weight drag on aggregate demand and it
goes to show that the real story in Q3 was not that it was so wonderful that
real GDP expanded at a 3.5% annual rate but that the number was so low in
view of the massive dose of government stimulus and that the contraction in
credit is ongoing and acting as a tourniquet on private sector spending
activity.

Meanwhile, cash on banking sector balance sheets soared $160 billion last
week and now total a record $1.3 trillion, and the bond bears out there
should note that this cash is increasingly being diverted towards purchases
of Treasury securities as opposed to household and business lending. This is
1992-93 all over again when the commercial banks used the steep yield curve
as an opportunity to reliquify their balance sheets, and the flip side of
that process was a listless and jobless recovery. The only difference is
that the credit contraction process this time around will prove to be even
more pernicious and enduring than it was back then, and inevitably drag
Treasury note yields back down towards the lows we saw almost a year ago.

Indeed, the question about whether the ongoing credit contraction is being
led by supply or demand factors is an interesting one and there were some
newspaper articles today that shed some light on this. First, the front page
of the WSJ runs with Jittery Companies Stash Cash — the article cites data
showing that of the 248 companies that have reported thus far (from the S&P
500 universe), cash on the balance sheet rose to a 11.1% of assets from
10.1% in Q2 (and 7.9% a year ago) which is the highest in 40 years. So,
either the corporate sector is seeing a rather different economic outlook
than the mainstream economist (and hedge fund manager) or there are simply
few new investments that are seen as offering very good return potential by
the business sector.

Now on the demand side, we highly recommend the piece on page 17 of the FT –
Credit Card Offers to U.S. Consumers Plunge 71%”. A survey highlighted in
the article showed that U.S. credit issuers sent 391 million direct mail
offers in Q3, down a whopping 71% from a year ago and light years away from
the 2 billion cards per quarter that were being mailed out during the
2005-06 credit boom. Note that average interest rates on plastic rose 100bps
last quarter to 11.43%, so this notion of rate relief may have hit the odd
stressed-out mortgage borrower but seemed to have bypassed credit card
users.

Source: Gluskin Sheff

-- 
Best Regards,
Jay Shah, FRM

"Expect The Unexpected"
Blog: http://fuzylogix.blogspot.com/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""GLOBAL SPECULATORS"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalspeculators?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to