MF turmoil: Can SEBI be held accountable?
January 14, 2010 01:18 PM | 
Moneylife Digital Team

 

SEBI's move to scrap entry loads on mutual funds may have been well
intentioned, but it tripped badly in failing to assess the ground realities
and the consequences of its actions

Five months after the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) scrapped
entry loads on mutual fund (MF) schemes, the industry continues to be on the
decline with further ill-conceived band-aid like trading through stock
exchanges failing to attract investors. In the five months after the SEBI
move, Rs7,200 crore of funds have moved out of equity schemes and flown,
almost entirely, to Unit Linked Insurance Plans (ULIPs).

SEBI's move may have been well intentioned, but it tripped badly in failing
to assess the ground realities and the consequences of its actions. It
failed to visualise that sharply higher commissions paid by the insurance
industry will suck money out of MFs. It also failed to ensure the
availability of inexpensive alternative distribution channels. Consequently,
investors continue to pay commissions, but only to other intermediaries such
as banks or others in the exchange traded system. The question is, when will
the regulator admit its mistake and initiate corrective action?

If SEBI had attempted to seek feedback before bringing in the regulation, it
would have highlighted the impact of a hasty scrapping of entry loads on the
fund industry and cautioned it against blundering ahead. A report by
McKinsey & Co, the leading global consultancy firm, had enumerated some key
issues even in August 2009, when the SEBI order came into effect. Even then,
the fund industry was in turmoil and assets under management (AUM), which
had been growing at 50% on a year-on-year basis, had declined by a sharp
17%.

McKinsey had pointed out that bank and national distributors who have
control over the "customer's wallet" would be in a position to charge. That
is exactly what is happening today. Banks were blamed for extorting huge
paybacks from Asset Management Companies (AMCs), they have smoothly switched
to debiting customer accounts for advisory fees.

McKinsey had also said that AMCs would have to continue compensating
distributors (mainly banks) from their reduced fees. They may also increase
exit loads for customers across holding periods-but this would be restricted
to 100 bps. Here is what else McKinsey had predicted for the industry. 

. Higher exit loads and transparent commissions would reduce the propensity
to churn investments. 
. Portfolio management services and alternate products will grow faster.
AMCs and distributors will push higher margin products, especially debt
products. This has indeed played out as predicted. 
. The industry will undergo consolidation since smaller AMCs would find it
difficult to manage the stress on their finances. Entry barriers will
increase and it may even be difficult for new schemes to find distribution
partners. However, the fact that SEBI has over 12 to 14 pending applications
seems to suggest that the financial sector is not giving up on the mutual
fund industry as yet. 
. Most pertinently, the report had pointed out that it is IFAs (independent
financial advisors) who help in geographic penetration of financial
products. With IFAs, especially the smaller ones losing the incentive to
sell mutual funds, the geographic penetration of the industry was bound to
slow down. McKinsey's data shows that beyond the top eight cities, IFAs are
the dominant distribution channel accounting for just under 50% of the
market. 

http://www.moneylife.in/article/8/3204.html

 

 

 

With Warm Regards

 

Zoher Doctor / Smart Money Inc.

Financial Planner

 

402, Bholesai Apt., Bh. Emperor, Parsi St, Fatehgunj, Vadodara 390002  GUJ
INDIA

Direct: +91 9824063400

Alternate E-Mail: [email protected]

Group: http://groups.google.co.in/group/smartmoneyinc

 

<<image001.gif>>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""GLOBAL SPECULATORS"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/globalspeculators?hl=en.

Reply via email to