Cartel fine will cast a long shadow <http://www.globalcement.com/news/item/1015-cartel-fine-will-cast-a-long-shadow> Wednesday 27 June 2012
*India: *The announcement last week that 11 Indian cement producers face a combined US$1.1bn penalty<http://www.globalcement.com/news/item/1003-india-fines-cement-firms-us$11bn-over-cartel>for a price-fixing cartel will cast a long shadow over the country's increasingly vulnerable-looking cement industry. For years the Indian cement industry has been beset by suspicions of over-capacity despite a constant stream of new capacity. Now the Competition Commission of India (CCI) thinks that it has got to the heart of the paradox by accusing manufacturers of limiting production amid high demand and colluding to artificially raise prices. The amount that the CCI has fined the companies, 50% of their net profits for the two fiscal years to 31 March 2011, is quite astonishing. If enforced in its entirety the fine effectively negates a large portion of the sector's profits for an entire fiscal year. This is clearly not a slap-on-the-wrist from the CCI. In the 1990s and early 2000s a similar cartel case involving European (and specifically German) cement producers led to fines in the order of hundreds of thousands of US Dollars. The industry has since cleaned up its act considerably as a result. Indian producers would be foolish not to follow suit. What are the likely effects in the Indian case? Removing the cartel that the CCI purports to have found would reduce prices, which are inflated by an oft-quoted 25% median in a cartel. This is clearly good news for consumers and potentially the development of the Indian economy in general. The obvious losers in this situation would be the producers, which would see a reduction in profitability. Some of the smaller producers would find such a situation very challenging, with the risk of going bust or being absorbed into larger companies. Another possibility is that the accusations will spread along the value chain. Shortly after the announcement of the fine, the Builders' Association of India (BAI), announced that it wants the fine increased<http://www.globalcement.com/news/item/1005-builders-call-for-harsher-cartel-penalty>to accommodate compensation claims from contractors and consumers that it feels are out-of-pocket as a result of the cartel. Many will feel aggrieved now that they 'know' the cement companies were profiteering - sorting out claims from affected parties could be a long and costly exercise. The effects of the fine could also extend to outside of India. Indian cement producers, very good customers of the Chinese and European cement plant manufacturers in recent years, will have to deal with lower revenues. This will clearly dampen their enthusiasm to contract further capacity and may cause knock-on-effects for Sinoma, KHD, Polysuis and other major suppliers. The cement industries of neighbouring countries, like Pakistan, may also be affected. Whatever happens in the Indian cement industry as a result of the CCI's fine, the authority, only formed in 2009, has shown that it is serious about taking on corruption in India. In the long run that can only help develop the potential of the country. * * *"The first thing for any new competition regulator is to go out and find the cement cartel. My experience of this subject is, it is always there, somewhere," * wrote Richard Whish, a Professor of Law at King's College London in 2001.* "The only countries in which I had been unable to find the cement cartel is where there is a national state-owned monopoly for cement." * On Thursday, June 21, 2012 4:33:45 PM UTC+5:30, CA.RAJUBHAI DESAI wrote: > > > > CCI to cement cartel: Pay 50% of FY10 profits as > penalty<http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/cci-to-cement-cartel-pay-50fy10-profits-as-penalty_720848.html> > [image: CCI to cement cartel: Pay 50% of FY10 profits as penalty] The > Competition Commission of Indian has penalised RS 6,300 fine on 11 cement > companies for forming > <http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/cci-to-cement-cartel-pay-50fy10-profits-as-penalty_720848.html> > -- > CA. Rajesh Desai > > On Thursday, June 21, 2012 4:33:45 PM UTC+5:30, CA.RAJUBHAI DESAI wrote: > > > > CCI to cement cartel: Pay 50% of FY10 profits as > penalty<http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/cci-to-cement-cartel-pay-50fy10-profits-as-penalty_720848.html> > [image: CCI to cement cartel: Pay 50% of FY10 profits as penalty] The > Competition Commission of Indian has penalised RS 6,300 fine on 11 cement > companies for forming > <http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/cci-to-cement-cartel-pay-50fy10-profits-as-penalty_720848.html> > -- > CA. Rajesh Desai > > On Thursday, June 21, 2012 4:33:45 PM UTC+5:30, CA.RAJUBHAI DESAI wrote: > > > > CCI to cement cartel: Pay 50% of FY10 profits as > penalty<http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/cci-to-cement-cartel-pay-50fy10-profits-as-penalty_720848.html> > [image: CCI to cement cartel: Pay 50% of FY10 profits as penalty] The > Competition Commission of Indian has penalised RS 6,300 fine on 11 cement > companies for forming > <http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/cci-to-cement-cartel-pay-50fy10-profits-as-penalty_720848.html> > -- > CA. Rajesh Desai > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""GLOBAL SPECULATORS"" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/globalspeculators/-/rfFjQJcmwIkJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/globalspeculators?hl=en.
