Hello

You can already do this with the foreach tag : 

##FOREACH LAST Xfollowups##
##FOREACH LAST Xtasks##

Where X is the number of the last items you want.


Example :

##FOREACH LAST 1followups##
   ##followup.author##
   ##followup.date##
   ##followup.description##
   ##followup.isprivate##
   ##followup.requesttype##
##ENDFOREACHfollowups##


and 


##FOREACH LAST 1tasks##
   ##task.author##
   ##task.begin##
   ##task.category##
   ##task.date##
   ##task.description##
   ##task.end##
   ##task.isprivate##
   ##task.status##
   ##task.time##
   ##task.user##
##ENDFOREACHtasks##

Regards

----- Mail original -----
> Dear all,
> 
> I propose to add a set of TAGs for the notification templates, the purpose of
> these will be to have the possibility to get the latest added or modified
> 'Follow-up' or the latest added or modified 'Task'.
> 
> ##followup.latest.author##
> ##followup.latest.date##
> ##followup.latest.description##
> ##followup.latest.isprivate##
> ##followup.latest.requesttype##
> 
> ##task.latest.author##
> ##task.latest.begin##
> ##task.latest.category##
> ##task.latest.date##
> ##task.latest.description##
> ##task.latest.end##
> ##task.latest.isprivate##
> ##task.latest.status##
> ##task.latest.time##
> ##task.latest.user##
> 
> This will give the possibility to send notifications which will contain only
> the concerned follow-up or task to receivers.
> 
> Thank you,
> Regards,
> 
> Olivier MORON
> Miscellaneous Program Member
> 
> RAYNET SNC
> Tel : +33 4 76 33 49 52
> Fax: +33 4 76 70 56 63
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: glpi-dev-boun...@gna.org [mailto:glpi-dev-boun...@gna.org] On Behalf Of
> David DURIEUX
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 4:44 PM
> To: glpi-dev@gna.org
> Subject: Re: [Glpi-dev] 0.84- patch qui remplace is_array qui est un peu lent
> 
> Faudrait faire pareil dans la même classe pour
> clean_cross_side_scripting_deep
> 
> J'avais zappé dans le patch
> 
> David
> 
> 
> Le Wed, 20 Mar 2013 16:41:14 +0100
> David DURIEUX <d.duri...@siprossii.com> a écrit:
> 
> >Bonjour,
> >
> >is_array est un peu lent, voici un patch qui empeche son utilisation.
> >
> >is_array :
> >24924 call de la fonction addslashes_deep (dans un inventaire fusion)
> >1067086 ms d'execution
> >1088283 cpu ticks
> >2678352 mémoire
> >
> >sans is_array :
> >24924 call de la fonction addslashes_deep (dans un inventaire fusion)
> >940770 ms d'execution (88%)
> >948907 cpu ticks (97%)
> >2674864 mémoire
> >
> >
> >
> >Cordialement,
> >--
> >David DURIEUX
> >Tel : +33 (0)4.82.53.30.53
> >Mail : d.duri...@siprossii.com
> >Site Web : http://www.siprossii.com/
> >
> >SIPROSSII
> >Les Lafôrets
> >69430 Beaujeu
> >FRANCE
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Glpi-dev mailing list
> Glpi-dev@gna.org
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/glpi-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Glpi-dev mailing list
> Glpi-dev@gna.org
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/glpi-dev
>

_______________________________________________
Glpi-dev mailing list
Glpi-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/glpi-dev

Reply via email to