----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any
advice in this forum.]----






> Guys I sent my comments 2 weeks ago, but here again the copy.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hartmut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:52 AM
> Subject: Docket No. 2001-CE-45-AD
>
>
> > To whom it may concern.
> >
> > HI.
> > As an owner of an aircraft described in this proposed AD (Ercoupe) I
wish
> to
> > make a comment.
> > I do understand the concernes about an aging fleet of aircraft and the
> > potential corrosion they might carry.
> >
> > Here my concernes regarding the recommended procedure.
> > 1. Cutting additional holes into the aircraft will make remove some of
the
> > structuaral strength we actually want to assure.
> >
> > 2. Although the described corrosion was found in one neglegted plane,
> which
> > was intended to be scrapped, it does not indicate that the whole fleet
is
> > affected.
> >
> > 3. Because corrosion developes generally slowly, a recurrent check of
> every
> > 3 annuals or 300 hours should be sufficiant.
> >
> > 4. The best method to check these areas is to remove the wings and
make
a
> > visual check to the then very accessable areas in conjunction with  a
> > removal of the interior parts to conclude the check from inside. This
kind
> > of procedure should be added as optional (and most throughly ) check.
> >
> > 5. My recommendation is to allow a one time visual checks via wing
removal
> > or boroscope to see whether the Fleet is truly affected by corrosion
in
> this
> > area.
> > If indeed more than a few Aircraft need repairs because of corrosion
in
> this
> > area I would understand and welcome the described inspection methods
and
> > time frames .
> >
> > 6. If on the other hand the fleet is actually mostly corrosion free I
> would
> > not see much of a benefit of having the 8 extra holes being inspected
> every
> > year, adding only costs to the owner.
> >
> > To say it simple.
> > Please let us check the fleet of Aircrafts first before we add such
> drastic
> > measures .
> >
> > Regards Hartmut Beil
> >
>

==================================================================
TO UNSUBSCRIBE go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm



<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to