Am 19.02.2015 um 10:06 schrieb Humble Devassy Chirammal:
Hi Neils,
>
My guess is that we need to announce packaging changes very clearly.
Maybe it makes sense to have a very low-traffic packag...@gluster.org
<mailto:packag...@gluster.org>
mailinglist where all packagers from all distributions are subscribed?
>
+1 , its better to have a ML on packaging and discuss about the
changes/concerns/issues in this area.
With my Debian glusterfs maintainer hat on, also: +1
--Humble
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com
<mailto:nde...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hey Pranith!
Thanks for putting this topic on my radar. Uncommunicated packaging
changes have indeed been a pain for non-RPM distributions on several
occasions. We should try to inform other packagers about required
changes in the packaging scripts or upgrade/installation process
better.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:26:33PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113778
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191176
>
> How can we make the process of giving good packages for things
other than
> RPMs?
My guess is that we need to announce packaging changes very clearly.
Maybe it makes sense to have a very low-traffic
packag...@gluster.org <mailto:packag...@gluster.org>
mailinglist where all packagers from all distributions are subscribed?
I've added all packagers that I could track on CC, and am
interested in
their preferences and ideas.
Thanks,
Niels
--
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
Blog: http://www.linux-dev.org/
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@linux-dev.org
*/
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
