forgot to mention patch url    http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10475.

owner should use upstream bug id while sending patch to upstream and downstream 
bug id while sending patch to downstream branch. 

Thanks 

Regards
Gaurav

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gaurav Garg" <[email protected]>
To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Gluster Devel" <[email protected]>, "Sakshi Bansal" 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 10:46:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] spurious failure in tests/bugs/cli/bug-1087487.t

Hi Pranith,


Actually there is problem is sender patch. Its a intended behavior not a 
spurious. Current patch is not solving what bug actually say along with it the 
patch owner should look into the failure test case once and  patch owner should 
modify the test cases if there is actual need of modify test case based on the 
sender current patch. 

I have posted a comment on the patch itself. once that comments will resolve 
this problem will be disappear. 

ccing patch owner. 

Thank you....

~Gaurav

----- Original Message -----
From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <[email protected]>
To: "Gaurav Garg" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Gluster Devel" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 8:52:16 PM
Subject: spurious failure in tests/bugs/cli/bug-1087487.t

Gaurav,
      Please look into 
http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/8409/console

Pranith
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Reply via email to