> I would expect the snapshot-scheduler feature to be maintained by the > proposed snapshot maintainer for now.
IIUC volume-snapshot (glusterd mainly), USS and snapshot-scheduler (python based) all fall into snapshot maintenance. > > I am also not a major fan of a single component being managed by > multiple folks. Given that respective component maintainers will be > managing their parts of glusterd & CLI going forward, I think we are > positioned reasonably well to manage patches in glusterd. What problems do you see with multiple maintainers? We have that working well in glusterd for over a year. In fact, we are adding one more to glusterd. We are proposing multiple maintainers for erasure-coding, libglusterfs and bit-rot to name a few. _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
