On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Atin Mukherjee <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Sent from Samsung Galaxy S4
> On 13 Jun 2015 12:58, "Anand Nekkunti" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All
> >    Rebalance is not working in single node cluster environment ( current
> test frame work ).  I am getting error in below test , it seems re-balance
> is not migrated to  current cluster test framework.
> Could you pin point which test case fails and what log do you see?
> >
> > cleanup;
> > TEST launch_cluster 2;
> > TEST $CLI_1 peer probe $H2;
> >
> > EXPECT_WITHIN $PROBE_TIMEOUT 1 check_peers
> >
> > $CLI_1 volume create $V0 $H1:$B1/$V0  $H2:$B2/$V0
> > EXPECT 'Created' volinfo_field $V0 'Status';
> >
> > $CLI_1 volume start $V0
> > EXPECT 'Started' volinfo_field $V0 'Status';
> >
> > #Mount FUSE
> > TEST glusterfs -s $H1 --volfile-id=$V0 $M0;
> >
> > TEST mkdir $M0/dir{1..4};
> > TEST touch $M0/dir{1..4}/files{1..4};
> >
> > TEST $CLI_1 volume add-brick $V0 $H1:$B1/${V0}1 $H2:$B2/${V0}1
> >
> > TEST $CLI_1 volume rebalance $V0  start
> >
> > EXPECT_WITHIN 60 "completed" CLI_1_rebalance_status_field $V0
> >
> > $CLI_2 volume status $V0
> > EXPECT 'Started' volinfo_field $V0 'Status';
> >
> > cleanup;
> >
> > Regards
> > Anand.N
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
>
If it is a crash of glusterd when you do rebalance start, it is because of
FORTIFY_FAIL in libc.
Here is the patch that Susant has already sent:
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11090/

You can verify that it is the same crash by checking the core in gdb; a
SIGABRT would be raised
after strncpy.

-- 
*Raghavendra Talur *
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Reply via email to