Jeff Darcy <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd prefer a "defined level of effort" approach which *might* reduce the > benefit we derive from NetBSD testing but *definitely* keeps the cost > under control.
Did we identify the worst offenders within the spurious failing tests? We could ignore their output on NetBSD (this is how I started). -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz [email protected] _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
