On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Kaushal M <kshlms...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Raghavendra Talur <rta...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Top posting, this is a very old thread. >> >> Keeping in view the recent NetBSD problems and the number of bugs creeping >> in, I suggest we do these things right now: >> >> a. Change the gerrit merge type to fast forward only. >> As explained below in the thread, with our current setup even if both PatchA >> and PatchB pass regression separately when both are merged it is possible >> that a functional bug creeps in. >> This is the only solution to prevent that from happening. >> I will work with Kaushal to get this done. >> >> b. In Jenkins, remove gerrit trigger and make it a manual operation > > Making it manual might be too much work for maintainers. I suggest (as > I've suggested before) we make regressions trigger when a change has > been reviewed +2 by a maintainer. > >> >> Too many developers use the upstream infra as a test cluster and it is >> *not*. >> It is a verification mechanism for maintainers to ensure that the patch does >> not cause regression. >> It is required that all developers run full regression on their machines >> before asking for reviews. >> Reviewers should review the patch only when the developer has given a +1 >> verified on the patch. >> Again, I will work with Kaushal to get this done. >> >> P.S: Stop using the "universal" jenkins account to trigger jenkins build if >> you are not a maintainer. >> If you are a maintainer and don't have your own jenkins account then get one >> soon! > > I think I'll go ahead and remove this account.
This is done now. > >> >> Thanks, >> Raghavendra Talur >> _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
