On 01/28/2016 09:57 AM, Sakshi Bansal wrote:
>
>> If anything is going in mainline I'd encourage the same to be backported
>> irrespective of the severity of the fix, so that's out of the equation.
> Will keep this is mind in future.
>
>
>> I'd like to stick to remove brick_up_status(). Please use the same in
>> all the places. You can include all these changes in the same backport
>> but please ensure the commit message explains the delta between mainline
>> and the backport.
> Since it is required to remove one of the redundant functions in upstream as
> well,
> would it be better to just backport patch #10954 and send a separate patch to
> remove
> the redundant function in upstream and on 3.7?
That's your call :)
>
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
