On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:10:40AM -0500, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote:
> On 02/13/2016 08:37 AM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Kaushal M <kshlms...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 6:41 PM, André Bauer <aba...@magix.net> wrote:
> >>> Already asked myself why this not exists.
> >>>
> >>> so... +1 from me.
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> André
> >>>
> >>> Am 04.02.2016 um 16:43 schrieb Niels de Vos:
> >>>>
> >>>> How about a project to write a fuse client based on libgfapi and
> >>>> libfuse instead? That would reduce the need for our fuse-bridge
> >>>> over time. libgfapi should be ready for this, Samba, NFS-Ganesha
> >>>> and others already use it heavily.
> >>>>
> >>
> >> +1 from me too. But we need a mentor for this. Neils would you be a
> >> willing mentor?
> > 
> > If this is the only project idea which exists, the application
> > organization for GSoC would be somewhat weak. Organizations are
> > usually expected to come up with a number (more than one) of ideas
> > which are also attached with (at least) one mentor. More at
> > <https://flossmanuals.net/GSoCMentoring/making-your-ideas-page/> (as a
> > manner of guidance)
> 
> How about a gfapi-based bash shell.

glusterfs-coreutils actually does this already. If features are missing,
you can report them in the GitHub project:

  https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs-coreutils/issues

Niels

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Reply via email to