On 03/16/2016 11:31 AM, Raghavendra Talur wrote:
Hi,

Lot many fixes to tests were found to be not back ported to 3.7 and other release branches. This causes tests to fail only in those branches and leaves the maintainers puzzled.

Also, this seems to be the case with back porting code fixes too.

I copied all the changes to tests/ dir on master to tests/ dir on 3.7 branch and posted a patch at http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13683/ .

This is failing for ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-860663.t test :
[10:39:11] Running tests in file ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-860663.t
tar: Removing leading `/' from member names
./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-860663.t ..
1..15
ok 1, LINENUM:23
ok 2, LINENUM:24
ok 3, LINENUM:26
ok 4, LINENUM:27
ok 5, LINENUM:30
ok 6, LINENUM:32
ok 7, LINENUM:35
not ok 8 , LINENUM:40
FAILED COMMAND: ! gluster --mode=script --wignore volume rebalance patchy fix-layout start
ok 9, LINENUM:42
ok 10, LINENUM:43
ok 11, LINENUM:45
ok 12, LINENUM:47
ok 13, LINENUM:50
ok 14, LINENUM:51
ok 15, LINENUM:55
Failed 1/15 subtests

Given that it is a simple rebalance command that is failing I am assuming that a critical patch has not been back ported to 3.7, correct me if I am wrong.

I request every developer to take responsibility of back porting patches.


Corollary question: Our test-framework is now capable of disabling tests for certain OS, certain branch etc. I would like to propose that we stop having tests in main git repo. This will remove need to back port test only fixes.

Some times what I do is to enhance existing test to handle extra cases based on new code that is added on master. Until the code-fix is not backported to lower versions, the tests are not valid. Should we mark such tests disabled when we do enhancements to .t files?

Pranith


Thanks,
Raghavendra Talur



_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Reply via email to