CCing Vijay Kumar who made the acl related changes in that patch. Vijay? Can you please look into it?
Regards, Raghavendra On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Avra Sengupta <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Raghavendra, > > As part of the patch (http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13730/16), the > inode_ctx is not created in posix_acl_ctx_get(). Because of this the > testcase in http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13623/ breaks. It fails with > the following logs: > > [2016-03-28 13:43:39.216168] D [MSGID: 0] [io-threads.c:346:iot_schedule] > 0-patchy-io-threads: CREATE scheduled as normal fop > [2016-03-28 13:43:39.216495] E [posix-acl.c:199:acl_permits] (--> > /usr/local/lib/libglusterfs.so.0(_gf_log_callingfn+0x1ba)[0x7f6fea72780a] > (--> > /usr/local/lib/glusterfs/3.8dev/xlator/features/access-control.so(+0x49c4)[0x7f6fde5499c4] > (--> > /usr/local/lib/glusterfs/3.8dev/xlator/features/access-control.so(+0xa855)[0x7f6fde54f855] > (--> > /usr/local/lib/glusterfs/3.8dev/xlator/features/locks.so(+0xd37e)[0x7f6fde33837e] > (--> > /usr/local/lib/glusterfs/3.8dev/xlator/features/upcall.so(+0x640f)[0x7f6fde12040f] > ))))) 0-patchy-access-control: inode ctx is NULL for > 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001 > [2016-03-28 13:43:39.216544] I [MSGID: 115071] > [server-rpc-fops.c:1612:server_create_cbk] 0-patchy-server: 8: CREATE > /file1 (00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001/file1) ==> (Permission denied) > [Permission denied] > > Is it because we missed the inode_ctx creation that was being done by > posix_acl_ctx_get() previously? Can you please shed some light on this > > Regards, > Avra > > >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
