On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Amye Scavarda <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>
>> All in favor of the 'everyone working on this should clone again'
>> approach.
>
Both approaches require cloning again, so which on are we voting for?
1. Prashanth's approach
- modify existing repo
- users re clone
- push force to their forks on github
2. Misc's approach
- create a new minified repo
- users clone/fork the new repo
I don't mind either.
>
> +2 on the same thought. :)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
