Thanks for the patch Poornima. On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah <[email protected] > wrote:
> Hi, > > Thanks Pranith. Here is the patch for the same: > http://review.gluster.org/14997 > The failure is not because there was a hang(the logs show that > glfs_set_volfile_server was still executing), but because the EXPECT_WITHIN > was not really waiting. And hence there was a race between the execution of > the process gfapi_hang and the kill. > > Regards, > Poornima > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <[email protected]> > > To: "Soumya Koduri" <[email protected]>, "Poornima Gurusiddaiah" > > <[email protected]> > > Cc: "Gluster Devel" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2016 8:20:36 AM > > Subject: spurious failure in tests/basic/gfapi/libgfapi-fini-hang.t > > > I see both of your names in git blame output. > > > https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/22439/console > > has more information about the failure. This failure happened on > > http://review.gluster.org/#/c/14985/ which changes only .t files so I > > believe the reason for the failure to be something else. Could you please > > take a look to find if there is a problem with the test or if it caught a > > race in some recent code change? > > > -- > > Pranith > -- Pranith
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
