On Saturday 27 August 2016, Prasanna Kalever <[email protected]> wrote:

> Here is the patch that should fix it
> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15331/


Thanks! Well thats an easy way, but the question here is dont we need the
parent patch to be merged to ensure there is no other functionality broken.
Currently I see that the parent patch has a -1, in that case is it required
to revert 15225?

>
> Happy weekend!
>
> --
> Prasanna
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Atin Mukherjee <[email protected]
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > [1] has broken mainline compilation and I feel this could be because its
> > parent patch is not been merged otherwise smoke should have caught it.
> > Please resolve it at earliest.
> >
> > [1] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15225/
> >
> >
> > --Atin
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > [email protected] <javascript:;>
> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> [email protected] <javascript:;>
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>


-- 
--Atin
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Reply via email to