So the test fails (intermittently) in check_fs which tries to do a df on
the mount point for a volume which is carved out of three bricks from 3
nodes and one node is completely down. A quick look at the mount log
reveals the following:

[2016-10-10 13:58:59.279446]:++++++++++
G_LOG:./tests/bugs/glusterd/bug-913555.t:
TEST: 48 0 check_fs /mnt/glusterfs/0 ++++++++++
[2016-10-10 13:58:59.287973] W [MSGID: 114031]
[client-rpc-fops.c:2930:client3_3_lookup_cbk]
0-patchy-client-2:      remote operation failed. Path: /
(00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001) [Transport endpoint is not connected]
[2016-10-10 13:58:59.288326] I [MSGID: 109063]
[dht-layout.c:713:dht_layout_normalize]
0-patchy-dht: Found anomalies in / (gfid =
00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001).
Holes=1 overlaps=0
[2016-10-10 13:58:59.288352] W [MSGID: 109005]
[dht-selfheal.c:2102:dht_selfheal_directory]
0-patchy-dht: Directory  selfheal failed: 1 subvolumes down.Not fixing.
path = /, gfid =
[2016-10-10 13:58:59.288643] W [MSGID: 114031]
[client-rpc-fops.c:2930:client3_3_lookup_cbk]
0-patchy-client-2:      remote operation failed. Path: /
(00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001) [Transport endpoint is not connected]
[2016-10-10 13:58:59.288927] W [fuse-resolve.c:132:fuse_resolve_gfid_cbk]
0-fuse: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-           000000000001: failed to resolve
(Stale file handle)
[2016-10-10 13:58:59.288949] W [fuse-bridge.c:2597:fuse_opendir_resume]
0-glusterfs-fuse: 7: OPENDIR (00000000-0000- 0000-0000-000000000001)
resolution failed
[2016-10-10 13:58:59.289505] W [fuse-resolve.c:132:fuse_resolve_gfid_cbk]
0-fuse: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-           000000000001: failed to resolve
(Stale file handle)
[2016-10-10 13:58:59.289524] W [fuse-bridge.c:3137:fuse_statfs_resume]
0-glusterfs-fuse: 8: STATFS (00000000-0000-   0000-0000-000000000001)
resolution fail

DHT  team - are these anomalies expected here? I also see opendir and
statfs failing here too.

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukh...@redhat.com>
wrote:

> I will take a look at it in sometime.
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko <
> oleksa...@natalenko.name> wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> Vijay asked me to drop a note about spurious failure of
>> ./tests/bugs/glusterd/bug-913555.t test. Here are the examples:
>>
>> * https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/1069/consoleFull
>> * https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/1076/consoleFull
>>
>> Could someone take a look at it?
>>
>> Also, last two tests were broken because of this:
>>
>> ===
>> Slave went offline during the build
>> ===
>>
>> See these builds for details:
>>
>> * https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/1077/consoleFull
>> * https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/1078/consoleFull
>>
>> Was that intentionally?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Regards,
>>   Oleksandr
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>> Gluster-devel@gluster.org
>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> --Atin
>



-- 

--Atin
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Reply via email to