----- Original Message -----
> From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" <rgowd...@redhat.com>
> To: "Joe Julian" <j...@julianfamily.org>
> Cc: "Raghavendra G" <raghaven...@gluster.com>, "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" 
> <pkara...@redhat.com>, "Soumya Koduri"
> <skod...@redhat.com>, rta...@redhat.com, gluster-us...@gluster.org, "Gluster 
> Devel" <gluster-devel@gluster.org>,
> "Oleksandr Natalenko" <oleksa...@natalenko.name>
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 8:29:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS FUSE client hangs on   
> rsyncing lots of file
> 
> I've a patch [1], which I think fixes the problem in write-behind. If
> possible can anyone of you please let me know whether it fixes the issue
> (with client.io-threads turned on)?
> 
> [1] http://review.gluster.org/15579

I see some regression failures again in latest patchset, which I am working on 
to fix. However, you can use patchset 3 [2] for testing as it has passed all 
regressions.

[2] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15579/3

> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Joe Julian" <j...@julianfamily.org>
> > To: "Raghavendra G" <raghaven...@gluster.com>, "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> > <pkara...@redhat.com>, "Soumya Koduri"
> > <skod...@redhat.com>, rta...@redhat.com
> > Cc: gluster-us...@gluster.org, "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@gluster.org>
> > Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 12:16:01 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS FUSE client hangs on
> >     rsyncing lots of file
> > 
> > Interesting. I just encountered a hanging flush problem, too. Probably
> > unrelated but if you want to give this a try a temporary workaround I found
> > was to drop caches, "echo 3 > /proc/vm/drop_caches", on all the servers
> > prior to the flush operation.
> > 
> > On February 4, 2016 10:06:45 PM PST, Raghavendra G
> > <raghaven...@gluster.com>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > +soumyak, +rtalur.
> > 
> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
> > pkara...@redhat.com > wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On 01/28/2016 05:05 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > With baul jianguo's help I am able to see that FLUSH fops are hanging for
> > some reason.
> > 
> > pk1@localhost - ~/Downloads
> > 17:02:13 :) ⚡ grep "unique=" client-dump1.txt
> > unique=3160758373
> > unique= 2073075682
> > unique=1455047665
> > unique=0
> > 
> > pk1@localhost - ~/Downloads
> > 17:02:21 :) ⚡ grep "unique=" client-dump-0.txt
> > unique=3160758373
> > unique= 2073075682
> > unique=1455047665
> > unique=0
> > 
> > I will be debugging a bit more and post my findings.
> > +Raghavendra G
> > 
> > All the stubs are hung in write-behind. I checked that the statedumps
> > doesn't
> > have any writes in progress. May be because of some race, flush fop is not
> > resumed after write calls are complete? It seems this issue happens only
> > when io-threads is enabled on the client.
> > 
> > Pranith
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Pranith
> > On 01/28/2016 03:18 PM, baul jianguo wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > the client glusterfs gdb info, main thread id is 70800。
> > In the top output,70800 thread time 1263:30,70810 thread time
> > 1321:10,other thread time too small。
> > (gdb) thread apply all bt
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Thread 9 (Thread 0x7fc21acaf700 (LWP 70801)):
> > 
> > #0 0x00007fc21cc0c535 in sigwait () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> > 
> > #1 0x000000000040539b in glusterfs_sigwaiter (arg=<value optimized
> > out>) at glusterfsd.c:1653
> > 
> > #2 0x00007fc21cc04a51 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> > 
> > #3 0x00007fc21c56e93d in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Thread 8 (Thread 0x7fc21a2ae700 (LWP 70802)):
> > 
> > #0 0x00007fc21cc08a0e in pthread_cond_timedwait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from
> > /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> > 
> > #1 0x00007fc21ded02bf in syncenv_task (proc=0x121ee60) at syncop.c:493
> > 
> > #2 0x00007fc21ded6300 in syncenv_processor (thdata=0x121ee60) at
> > syncop.c:571
> > 
> > #3 0x00007fc21cc04a51 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> > 
> > #4 0x00007fc21c56e93d in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Thread 7 (Thread 0x7fc2198ad700 (LWP 70803)):
> > 
> > #0 0x00007fc21cc08a0e in pthread_cond_timedwait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from
> > /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> > 
> > #1 0x00007fc21ded02bf in syncenv_task (proc=0x121f220) at syncop.c:493
> > 
> > #2 0x00007fc21ded6300 in syncenv_processor (thdata=0x121f220) at
> > syncop.c:571
> > 
> > #3 0x00007fc21cc04a51 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> > 
> > #4 0x00007fc21c56e93d in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Thread 6 (Thread 0x7fc21767d700 (LWP 70805)):
> > 
> > #0 0x00007fc21cc0bfbd in nanosleep () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> > 
> > #1 0x00007fc21deb16bc in gf_timer_proc (ctx=0x11f2010) at timer.c:170
> > 
> > #2 0x00007fc21cc04a51 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> > 
> > #3 0x00007fc21c56e93d in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Thread 5 (Thread 0x7fc20fb1e700 (LWP 70810)):
> > 
> > #0 0x00007fc21c566987 in readv () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> > 
> > #1 0x00007fc21accbc55 in fuse_thread_proc (data=0x120f450) at
> > fuse-bridge.c:4752
> > 
> > #2 0x00007fc21cc04a51 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> > 
> > #3 0x00007fc21c56e93d in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 时间最多
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Thread 4 (Thread 0x7fc20f11d700 (LWP 70811)): 少点
> > 
> > #0 0x00007fc21cc0b7dd in read () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> > 
> > #1 0x00007fc21acc0e73 in read (data=<value optimized out>) at
> > /usr/include/bits/unistd.h:45
> > 
> > #2 notify_kernel_loop (data=<value optimized out>) at fuse-bridge.c:3786
> > 
> > #3 0x00007fc21cc04a51 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> > 
> > #4 0x00007fc21c56e93d in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Thread 3 (Thread 0x7fc1b16fe700 (LWP 206224)):
> > 
> > ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
> > 
> > #0 0x00007fc21cc08a0e in pthread_cond_timedwait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from
> > /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> > 
> > #1 0x00007fc20e515e60 in iot_worker (data=0x19eeda0) at io-threads.c:157
> > 
> > #2 0x00007fc21cc04a51 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> > 
> > #3 0x00007fc21c56e93d in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Thread 2 (Thread 0x7fc1b0bfb700 (LWP 214361)):
> > 
> > #0 0x00007fc21cc08a0e in pthread_cond_timedwait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from
> > /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> > 
> > #1 0x00007fc20e515e60 in iot_worker (data=0x19eeda0) at io-threads.c:157
> > 
> > #2 0x00007fc21cc04a51 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> > 
> > #3 0x00007fc21c56e93d in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Thread 1 (Thread 0x7fc21e31e700 (LWP 70800)):
> > 
> > #0 0x00007fc21c56ef33 in epoll_wait () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> > 
> > #1 0x00007fc21deea3e7 in event_dispatch_epoll (event_pool=0x120dec0)
> > at event-epoll.c:428
> > 
> > #2 0x00000000004075e4 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fff3dc93698) at
> > glusterfsd.c:1983
> > 
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 5:29 PM, baul jianguo < roidi...@gmail.com > wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > http://pastebin.centos.org/38941/
> > client statedump,only the pid 27419,168030,208655 hang,you can search
> > this pid in the statedump file。
> > 
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
> > < pkara...@redhat.com > wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Hi,
> > If the hang appears on enabling client side io-threads then it could
> > be because of some race that is seen when io-threads is enabled on the
> > client side. 2 things will help us debug this issue:
> > 1) thread apply all bt inside gdb (with debuginfo rpms/debs installed )
> > 2) Complete statedump of the mount at two intervals preferably 10 seconds
> > apart. It becomes difficult to find out which ones are stuck vs the ones
> > that are on-going when we have just one statedump. If we have two, we can
> > find which frames are common in both of the statedumps and then take a
> > closer look there.
> > 
> > Feel free to ping me on #gluster-dev, nick: pranithk if you have the
> > process
> > hung in that state and you guys don't mind me do a live debugging with you
> > guys. This option is the best of the lot!
> > 
> > Thanks a lot baul, Oleksandr for the debugging so far!
> > 
> > Pranith
> > 
> > 
> > On 01/25/2016 01:03 PM, baul jianguo wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 3.5.7 also hangs.only the flush op hung. Yes,off the
> > performance.client-io-threads ,no hang.
> > 
> > The hang does not relate the client kernel version.
> > 
> > One client statdump about flush op,any abnormal?
> > 
> > [global.callpool.stack.12]
> > 
> > uid=0
> > 
> > gid=0
> > 
> > pid=14432
> > 
> > unique=16336007098
> > 
> > lk-owner=77cb199aa36f3641
> > 
> > op=FLUSH
> > 
> > type=1
> > 
> > cnt=6
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.1]
> > 
> > ref_count=1
> > 
> > translator=fuse
> > 
> > complete=0
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.2]
> > 
> > ref_count=0
> > 
> > translator=datavolume-write-behind
> > 
> > complete=0
> > 
> > parent=datavolume-read-ahead
> > 
> > wind_from=ra_flush
> > 
> > wind_to=FIRST_CHILD (this)->fops->flush
> > 
> > unwind_to=ra_flush_cbk
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.3]
> > 
> > ref_count=1
> > 
> > translator=datavolume-read-ahead
> > 
> > complete=0
> > 
> > parent=datavolume-open-behind
> > 
> > wind_from=default_flush_resume
> > 
> > wind_to=FIRST_CHILD(this)->fops->flush
> > 
> > unwind_to=default_flush_cbk
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.4]
> > 
> > ref_count=1
> > 
> > translator=datavolume-open-behind
> > 
> > complete=0
> > 
> > parent=datavolume-io-threads
> > 
> > wind_from=iot_flush_wrapper
> > 
> > wind_to=FIRST_CHILD(this)->fops->flush
> > 
> > unwind_to=iot_flush_cbk
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.5]
> > 
> > ref_count=1
> > 
> > translator=datavolume-io-threads
> > 
> > complete=0
> > 
> > parent=datavolume
> > 
> > wind_from=io_stats_flush
> > 
> > wind_to=FIRST_CHILD(this)->fops->flush
> > 
> > unwind_to=io_stats_flush_cbk
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [global.callpool.stack.12.frame.6]
> > 
> > ref_count=1
> > 
> > translator=datavolume
> > 
> > complete=0
> > 
> > parent=fuse
> > 
> > wind_from=fuse_flush_resume
> > 
> > wind_to=xl->fops->flush
> > 
> > unwind_to=fuse_err_cbk
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Oleksandr Natalenko
> > < oleksa...@natalenko.name > wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > With "performance.client-io-threads" set to "off" no hangs occurred in 3
> > rsync/rm rounds. Could that be some fuse-bridge lock race? Will bring
> > that
> > option to "on" back again and try to get full statedump.
> > 
> > On четвер, 21 січня 2016 р. 14:54:47 EET Raghavendra G wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
> > 
> > pkara...@redhat.com > wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 01/18/2016 02:28 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > XFS. Server side works OK, I'm able to mount volume again. Brick is
> > 30%
> > full.
> > Oleksandr,
> > 
> > Will it be possible to get the statedump of the client, bricks
> > 
> > output next time it happens?
> > 
> > 
> > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/master/doc/debugging/statedump.m
> > d#how-to-generate-statedump
> > We also need to dump inode information. To do that you've to add
> > "all=yes"
> > to /var/run/gluster/glusterdump.options before you issue commands to get
> > statedump.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Pranith
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On понеділок, 18 січня 2016 р. 15:07:18 EET baul jianguo wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > What is your brick file system? and the glusterfsd process and all
> > thread status?
> > I met same issue when client app such as rsync stay in D status,and
> > the brick process and relate thread also be in the D status.
> > And the brick dev disk util is 100% .
> > 
> > On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Oleksandr Natalenko
> > 
> > < oleksa...@natalenko.name > wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Wrong assumption, rsync hung again.
> > 
> > On субота, 16 січня 2016 р. 22:53:04 EET Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > One possible reason:
> > 
> > cluster.lookup-optimize: on
> > cluster.readdir-optimize: on
> > 
> > I've disabled both optimizations, and at least as of now rsync
> > still
> > does
> > its job with no issues. I would like to find out what option causes
> > such
> > a
> > behavior and why. Will test more.
> > 
> > On пʼятниця, 15 січня 2016 р. 16:09:51 EET Oleksandr Natalenko
> > wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Another observation: if rsyncing is resumed after hang, rsync
> > itself
> > hangs a lot faster because it does stat of already copied files.
> > So,
> > the
> > reason may be not writing itself, but massive stat on GlusterFS
> > volume
> > as well.
> > 
> > 15.01.2016 09:40, Oleksandr Natalenko написав:
> > 
> > 
> > While doing rsync over millions of files from ordinary partition
> > to
> > GlusterFS volume, just after approx. first 2 million rsync hang
> > happens, and the following info appears in dmesg:
> > 
> > ===
> > [17075038.924481] INFO: task rsync:10310 blocked for more than
> > 120
> > seconds.
> > [17075038.931948] "echo 0 >
> > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs"
> > disables this message.
> > [17075038.940748] rsync D ffff88207fc13680 0 10310
> > 10309 0x00000080
> > [17075038.940752] ffff8809c578be18 0000000000000086
> > ffff8809c578bfd8
> > 0000000000013680
> > [17075038.940756] ffff8809c578bfd8 0000000000013680
> > ffff880310cbe660
> > ffff881159d16a30
> > [17075038.940759] ffff881e3aa25800 ffff8809c578be48
> > ffff881159d16b10
> > ffff88087d553980
> > [17075038.940762] Call Trace:
> > [17075038.940770] [<ffffffff8160a1d9>] schedule+0x29/0x70
> > [17075038.940797] [<ffffffffa023a53d>]
> > __fuse_request_send+0x13d/0x2c0
> > [fuse]
> > [17075038.940801] [<ffffffffa023db30>] ?
> > fuse_get_req_nofail_nopages+0xc0/0x1e0 [fuse]
> > [17075038.940805] [<ffffffff81098350>] ? wake_up_bit+0x30/0x30
> > [17075038.940809] [<ffffffffa023a6d2>]
> > fuse_request_send+0x12/0x20
> > [fuse]
> > [17075038.940813] [<ffffffffa024382f>] fuse_flush+0xff/0x150
> > [fuse]
> > [17075038.940817] [<ffffffff811c45c4>] filp_close+0x34/0x80
> > [17075038.940821] [<ffffffff811e4ed8>] __close_fd+0x78/0xa0
> > [17075038.940824] [<ffffffff811c6103>] SyS_close+0x23/0x50
> > [17075038.940828] [<ffffffff81614de9>]
> > system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> > ===
> > 
> > rsync blocks in D state, and to kill it, I have to do umount
> > --lazy
> > on
> > GlusterFS mountpoint, and then kill corresponding client
> > glusterfs
> > process. Then rsync exits.
> > 
> > Here is GlusterFS volume info:
> > 
> > ===
> > Volume Name: asterisk_records
> > Type: Distributed-Replicate
> > Volume ID: dc1fe561-fa3a-4f2e-8330-ec7e52c75ba4
> > Status: Started
> > Number of Bricks: 3 x 2 = 6
> > Transport-type: tcp
> > Bricks:
> > Brick1:
> > 
> > server1:/bricks/10_megaraid_0_3_9_x_0_4_3_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storage_0
> > 1
> > /as
> > te
> > risk/records Brick2:
> > 
> > server2:/bricks/10_megaraid_8_5_14_x_8_6_16_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storage
> > _
> > 01/
> > as
> > terisk/records Brick3:
> > 
> > server1:/bricks/11_megaraid_0_5_4_x_0_6_5_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storage_0
> > 2
> > /as
> > te
> > risk/records Brick4:
> > 
> > server2:/bricks/11_megaraid_8_7_15_x_8_8_20_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storage
> > _
> > 02/
> > as
> > terisk/records Brick5:
> > 
> > server1:/bricks/12_megaraid_0_7_6_x_0_13_14_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storage
> > _
> > 03/
> > as
> > terisk/records Brick6:
> > 
> > server2:/bricks/12_megaraid_8_9_19_x_8_13_24_hdd_r1_nolvm_hdd_storag
> > e
> > _03
> > /a
> > sterisk/records Options Reconfigured:
> > cluster.lookup-optimize: on
> > cluster.readdir-optimize: on
> > client.event-threads: 2
> > network.inode-lru-limit: 4096
> > server.event-threads: 4
> > performance.client-io-threads: on
> > storage.linux-aio: on
> > performance.write-behind-window-size: 4194304
> > performance.stat-prefetch: on
> > performance.quick-read: on
> > performance.read-ahead: on
> > performance.flush-behind: on
> > performance.write-behind: on
> > performance.io-thread-count: 2
> > performance.cache-max-file-size: 1048576
> > performance.cache-size: 33554432
> > features.cache-invalidation: on
> > performance.readdir-ahead: on
> > ===
> > 
> > The issue reproduces each time I rsync such an amount of files.
> > 
> > How could I debug this issue better?
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-users mailing list
> > gluster-us...@gluster.org
> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > Gluster-devel@gluster.org
> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > Gluster-devel@gluster.org
> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > Gluster-devel@gluster.org
> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-users mailing list
> > gluster-us...@gluster.org
> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > Gluster-devel@gluster.org
> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > Gluster-devel@gluster.org
> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > Gluster-devel@gluster.org
> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > Raghavendra G
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > Gluster-devel@gluster.org
> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> > 
> > --
> > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-users mailing list
> > gluster-us...@gluster.org
> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Reply via email to