On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Nithya Balachandran <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 14 November 2016 at 21:38, Vijay Bellur <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I would prefer that we disable dbench only if we have an owner for >> fixing the problem and re-enabling it as part of smoke tests. Running >> dbench seamlessly on gluster has worked for a long while and if it is >> failing today, we need to address this regression asap. >> >> Does anybody have more context or clues on why dbench is failing now? >> >> While I agree that it needs to be looked at asap, leaving it in until we > get an owner seems rather pointless as all it does is hold up various > patches and waste machine time. Re-triggering it multiple times so that it > eventually passes does not add anything to the regression test processes or > validate the patch as we know there is a problem. > I echo the same. > > I would vote for removing it and assigning someone to look at it > immediately. > > Regards, > Nithya > > Thanks! >> Vijay >> >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 3:45 AM, Nigel Babu <[email protected]> wrote: >> > It looks like. Nithya asked me to get some numbers. >> > >> > The first failure was on Aug 2nd [1]. Here are the monthly numbers since >> > August: >> > >> > Aug: 31 >> > Sep: 59 >> > Oct: 107 >> > Nov: 43 (in 14 days) >> > >> > [1]: https://build.gluster.org/job/smoke/29605/consoleText >> > >> > On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 10:04:58PM -0800, Joe Julian wrote: >> >> Does this mean race conditions are in master and are just being >> retried until they're not hit? >> >> >> >> On November 13, 2016 9:33:51 PM PST, Nithya Balachandran < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >Hi, >> >> > >> >> >Our smoke tests have been failing quite frequently of late. While >> >> >re-triggering smoke several times in order to get a +1 works >> >> >eventually, >> >> >this does not really help anything IMO. >> >> > >> >> >I believe Jeff has already proposed this earlier but can we remove the >> >> >failing dbench tests from smoke until we figure out what is going on? >> > >> > -- >> > nigelb >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Gluster-devel mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- ~ Atin (atinm)
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
