Thanks Shyam!

On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 at 06:45, Shyam <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 02/01/2017 12:14 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 at 17:06, Kaushal M <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi all,
> >
> >     GlusterFS-3.7.20 is intended to be the final release for release-3.7.
> >     3.7 enters EOL with the expected release of 3.10 in about 2 weeks.
> >
> >
> > Am I missing any key points here? With 3.10 coming in, 3.9 goes EOL
> > considering it is short term and then don't we need to maintain 3
> > releases at a point? In that case 3.7 still needs to be active with 3.8
> > & 3.10, no?
>
> No, we maintain the last 2 LTMs, so in this case that is 3.8 and 3.10
> (when 3.10 releases).
>
> Intermediate STMs are maintained for the 3 months till the next LTM
> comes along to replace it.
>
> Reference: https://www.gluster.org/community/release-schedule/
>
> >
> >
> >
> >     Once 3.10 is released I'll be closing any open bugs on 3.7 and
> >     abandoning any patches on review.
> >
> >     So as the subject says, developers please stop sending changes to
> >     release-3.7, and maintainers please don't merge any more changes onto
> >     release-3.7.
> >
> >     ~kaushal
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     maintainers mailing list
> >     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> >
> > --
> > - Atin (atinm)
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > maintainers mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> >
>
-- 
- Atin (atinm)
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Reply via email to