On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Atin Mukherjee <[email protected]> wrote:
> Can this patch be reverted asap as it has blocked other patches to get in? > IMO, we shouldn't be marking the test as bad given we know the patch which > introduced the regression. > I've posted https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16787 to revert the change. Can this be merged once it passes regression? > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Atin Mukherjee <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> https://review.gluster.org/16462 has caused this regression as per the >> git bisect. >> >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> This is being tracked @ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh >>> ow_bug.cgi?id=1427404, krutika posted a patch to move it to bad tests >>> until we find why a lookup on one file is leading to lookup on the hardlink >>> instead. >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Susant Palai <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> test case: ./tests/bitrot/bug-1373520.t is seen to be failing on >>>> different regression runs on master. >>>> Requesting to look in to it. >>>> >>>> Few instances: >>>> https://build.gluster.org/job/netbsd7-regression/3118/consoleFull >>>> https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/3451/ >>>> https://build.gluster.org/job/netbsd7-regression/3122/consoleFull >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Susant >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Gluster-devel mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Pranith >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gluster-devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> ~ Atin (atinm) >> > > > > -- > > ~ Atin (atinm) > -- ~ Atin (atinm)
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
